Yale 
W-L: (25- 9) PR = 97.1692
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
1017 H Robert Morris L (13-22, 94.3) 5- 2
1018 H Robert Morris L (13-22, 94.3) 4- 0
1024 H Quinnipiac AC (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 3
1025 H Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 4- 3
1031 A Cornell AC (20-12, 96.8) 0- 3
1101 A Colgate AC (19-15, 96.1) 5- 4
1104 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 0
1114 H Harvard AC (16-15, 95.8) 1- 4
1115 H Dartmouth AC ( 5-23, 93.9) 5- 0
1121 A St. Lawrence AC (12-21, 95.3) 3- 2
1122 A Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 2- 3
1125 A Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 3- 4
1128 A Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 5- 0
1129 A Connecticut (29- 9, 96.9) 2- 3
1206 A Brown AC (18-15, 96.0) 2- 4
1207 H Brown AC (18-15, 96.0) 3- 2
102 H Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 6- 3
103 H RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 7- 2
106 H Northeastern (28- 9, 96.6) 3- 0
109 A Dartmouth AC ( 5-23, 93.9) 3- 0
110 A Harvard AC (16-15, 95.8) 3- 2
116 H Colgate AC (19-15, 96.1) 3- 0
117 H Cornell AC (20-12, 96.8) 3- 1
119 H Providence (12-25, 94.0) 4- 2
130 A RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 8- 2
131 A Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 5- 2
206 H Clarkson AC (20-11, 96.7) 5- 4
207 H St. Lawrence AC (12-21, 95.3) 4- 1
213 A Princeton AC (23-10, 97.1) 2- 0
214 A Quinnipiac AC (28- 8, 97.7) 3- 4
227 H Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 4- 2
228 H Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 6- 1
306 H Cornell AC (20-12, 96.8) 7- 2
307 H Quinnipiac AC (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 5
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
1017 H Robert Morris 5- 2 3 3 -0.22
1018 H Robert Morris 4- 0 4 3 0.78
1024 H Quinnipiac 1- 3 -2 0 -1.87
1025 H Princeton 4- 3 1 0 0.58
1031 A Cornell 0- 3 -3 0 - -2.97
1101 A Colgate 5- 4 1 1 0.33
1104 A Saint Anselm 2- 0 2 3 -0.92
1114 H Harvard 1- 4 -3 2 -- -4.73
1115 H Dartmouth 5- 0 5 4 1.36
1121 A St. Lawrence 3- 2 1 2 -0.50
1122 A Clarkson 2- 3 -1 0 -1.09
1125 A Princeton 3- 4 -1 0 -0.64
1128 A Sacred Heart 5- 0 5 3 1.60
1129 A Connecticut 2- 3 -1 0 -0.89
1206 A Brown 2- 4 -2 1 - -2.80
1207 H Brown 3- 2 1 2 -0.58
102 H Union 6- 3 3 3 0.01
103 H RPI 7- 2 5 4 1.01
106 H Northeastern 3- 0 3 1 + 2.06
109 A Dartmouth 3- 0 3 3 0.13
110 A Harvard 3- 2 1 1 0.04
116 H Colgate 3- 0 3 1 1.56
117 H Cornell 3- 1 2 1 1.26
119 H Providence 4- 2 2 4 -1.57
130 A RPI 8- 2 6 3 + 2.78
131 A Union 5- 2 3 2 0.78
206 H Clarkson 5- 4 1 1 0.14
207 H St. Lawrence 4- 1 3 2 0.72
213 A Princeton 2- 0 2 0 + 2.36
214 A Quinnipiac 3- 4 -1 -1 -0.10
227 H Union 4- 2 2 3 -0.99
228 H Union 6- 1 5 3 + 2.01
306 H Cornell 7- 2 5 1 ++ 4.26
307 H Quinnipiac 1- 5 -4 0 - -3.87
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
1114 H Harvard 1- 4 -3 2 -- -4.73
1031 A Cornell 0- 3 -3 0 - -2.97
1206 A Brown 2- 4 -2 1 - -2.80
307 H Quinnipiac 1- 5 -4 0 - -3.87
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
306 H Cornell 7- 2 5 1 ++ 4.26
106 H Northeastern 3- 0 3 1 + 2.06
130 A RPI 8- 2 6 3 + 2.78
213 A Princeton 2- 0 2 0 + 2.36
228 H Union 6- 1 5 3 + 2.01
|
Yale Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Delaware |
Yale |
|
Yale   3- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
| Lindenwood |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Yale |
| Mercyhurst |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) |
Yale |
| Penn State |
Penn State |
|
tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 1) |
Penn State |
| RIT |
Yale |
|
Yale   5- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
| Robert Morris |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Syracuse |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) |
Yale |
| Brown |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 6- 5) ( 6- 4) |
Yale |
| Clarkson |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 7- 5)( 6- 3) |
Yale |
| Colgate |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Cornell |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Dartmouth |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Harvard |
Yale |
|
Yale   8- 5 vs 3- 6 |
|
| Princeton |
Yale |
Yale |
 
|
| Quinnipiac |
Quinnipiac |
Quinnipiac |
 
| |
| RPI |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| St. Lawrence |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Union |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Boston College |
Yale |
|
Yale   5- 2 vs 2- 4 |
|
| Boston University |
Yale |
|
Yale   3- 4 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Connecticut |
Connecticut |
Connecticut |
 
| |
| Holy Cross |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 1) |
Yale |
| Maine |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) |
Yale |
| Merrimack |
Yale |
|
Yale   3- 3 vs 0- 5 |
|
| New Hampshire |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 3- 3) ( 3- 1) |
Yale |
| Northeastern |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Providence |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Vermont |
Yale |
|
Yale   4- 3 vs 1- 2 |
|
| Assumption |
Yale |
|
Yale   3- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Franklin Pierce |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) |
Yale |
| LIU |
Yale |
|
Yale   4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Post |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Yale |
| Sacred Heart |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| Saint Anselm |
Yale |
Yale |
 
| |
| St.Michael's |
Yale |
|
 
| Yale |
| Stonehill |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 2) |
Yale |
| Bemidji State |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Yale |
| Minnesota |
Minnesota |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Minnesota |
| Minnesota Duluth |
Minnesota Duluth |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Minnesota Duluth |
| Minnesota State |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) |
Yale |
| Ohio State |
Ohio State |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Ohio State |
| St. Cloud State |
Yale |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 0) |
Yale |
| St. Thomas |
Yale |
|
tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) |
Yale |
| Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Wisconsin |
PowerWise = 37

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 36.18
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Robert Morris (13-22, 94.3) 5- 2 -5.57 2.37 -0.39 1.06 4.22
0 H Robert Morris (13-22, 94.3) 4- 0 -5.57 2.37 -0.39 1.06 4.22
0 H Quinnipiac (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 3 -2.22 5.71 -0.39 1.06 -1.39
0 H Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 4- 3 -2.76 5.17 -0.39 1.06 10.18
0 A Cornell (20-12, 96.8) 0- 3 -3.09 4.85 0.39 1.06 -1.44
0 A Colgate (19-15, 96.1) 5- 4 -3.79 4.14 0.39 1.06 9.64
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 0 -6.04 1.89 0.39 1.06 4.85
0 H Harvard (16-15, 95.8) 1- 4 -4.08 3.85 -0.39 1.06 -2.37
0 H Dartmouth ( 5-23, 93.9) 5- 0 -5.98 1.95 -0.39 1.06 3.33
0 A St. Lawrence (12-21, 95.3) 3- 2 -4.62 3.31 0.39 1.06 7.87
0 A Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 2- 3 -3.21 4.72 0.39 1.06 -1.50
0 A Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 3- 4 -2.76 5.17 0.39 1.06 -1.26
0 A Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 5- 0 -6.52 1.41 0.39 1.06 3.83
0 A Connecticut (29- 9, 96.9) 2- 3 -3.01 4.92 0.39 1.06 -1.40
0 A Brown (18-15, 96.0) 2- 4 -3.92 4.01 0.39 1.06 -1.88
0 H Brown (18-15, 96.0) 3- 2 -3.92 4.01 -0.39 1.06 7.72
0 H Union (12-22, 94.6) 6- 3 -5.34 2.60 -0.39 1.06 4.70
0 H RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 7- 2 -6.33 1.60 -0.39 1.06 2.58
0 H Northeastern (28- 9, 96.6) 3- 0 -3.28 4.65 -0.39 1.06 9.08
0 A Dartmouth ( 5-23, 93.9) 3- 0 -5.98 1.95 0.39 1.06 4.97
0 A Harvard (16-15, 95.8) 3- 2 -4.08 3.85 0.39 1.06 9.02
0 H Colgate (19-15, 96.1) 3- 0 -3.79 4.14 -0.39 1.06 8.00
0 H Cornell (20-12, 96.8) 3- 1 -3.09 4.85 -0.39 1.06 9.49
0 H Providence (12-25, 94.0) 4- 2 -5.91 2.02 -0.39 1.06 3.48
0 A RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 8- 2 -6.33 1.60 0.39 1.06 4.22
0 A Union (12-22, 94.6) 5- 2 -5.34 2.60 0.39 1.06 6.35
0 H Clarkson (20-11, 96.7) 5- 4 -3.21 4.72 -0.39 1.06 9.23
0 H St. Lawrence (12-21, 95.3) 4- 1 -4.62 3.31 -0.39 1.06 6.23
0 A Princeton (23-10, 97.1) 2- 0 -2.76 5.17 0.39 1.06 11.83
0 A Quinnipiac (28- 8, 97.7) 3- 4 -2.22 5.71 0.39 1.06 -0.97
0 H Union (12-22, 94.6) 4- 2 -5.34 2.60 -0.39 1.06 4.70
0 H Union (12-22, 94.6) 6- 1 -5.34 2.60 -0.39 1.06 4.70
0 H Cornell (20-12, 96.8) 7- 2 -3.09 4.85 -0.39 1.06 9.49
0 H Quinnipiac (28- 8, 97.7) 1- 5 -2.22 5.71 -0.39 1.06 -1.39
------
150.32
|
winning pts = 163.9182 losing points = -13.5988
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------